Last December I went to a faculty training, which went so well, that they invited me back for their next meeting. That was this past Monday. It was again an awesome meeting, one where hard questions were asked and discussions between thoughtful adults ensued. However, as with many workshops, we didn't have time to discuss ALL the questions. So, I've decided to email to the school my written response to the last question. As it is, I'm worried that it's a bit sharp, so, before I send it to an albeit 95% supportive school faculty/staff, I'd like to test the waters here.
Is the following question and answer set-up too "I used to teach argumentative writing for college students" in a bad way or a good way? The question originally in paragraph form, broken up into parts, reads:
1 Why are we addressing human sexuality issues with 10, 11, and 12 year old children?
2 Should we not give these children a chance to figure this out for themselves without putting labels on them and putting them into a situation that could cause them to be harassed and humiliated?
3 Are we not defeating the whole purpose of trying to protect these children from such [harassment and humiliation]?
In response to part1, part of reminding ourselves of heterosexual privilege means we need to remind ourselves of the pitfall of reducing GLBT issues to simple sexuality. Each straight person knows that his/her relationships and families are a HUGE part what we call our “lives.” GLBT people have spouses, mothers, and children too. GLBT people, as well as their family members no matter their ages should not be ignored or left out of times when it is expected or anticipated that we share about our families. And to speak specifically to 10, 11, and 12 year olds, don’t those children of GLBT parents have the right to see their own family structures represented and supported in school and society as well as the children of straight parents? So, we are not exactly talking about human sexuality, in terms of sexual acts. Indeed, I’m hard pressed imagining a time when middle school GSAs or classroom discussions of GLBT issues need to discuss acts of sex in any way, although I allow that there might be.
In response to part 2: First of all, I find the idea of letting the children fend for themselves, without guidance or support, is a very odd suggestion from an educator. Many people would agree that we shouldn’t just let a small child try to learn her ABCs or try to tie her shoes the first time, or try to brush her teeth for the first time without ANY assistance, support, or role models. As a society we don’t generally for anything let our children just fend for themselves (at least not right away). My experience shows that children understand faster when they receive encouragement and support and basic knowledge from adult models.
Secondly, GSAs (and classroom discussions around GLBT topics) are not places to LABEL the gay students as to separate them from others. I teach that every one has the right to label or not to label him/her/zie self; in fact, by definition and NAME, a Gay-Straight Alliance is a safe space where we come together and enjoy our differences and our similarities in a judgment free, harassment free zone. Most middle school GSAs are not political discussion groups or worked up about making waves in a school district. Middle school GSAs across the nation tend to be more socially focused. They are similar to other clubs: a space where friends with common interests and values can learn socialization and leadership skills by hanging out and or planning and implementing events together as a team. GSAs focus on eradicating the isolation and harrassment many students feel in adolescence.
(In response to part 3:) So no, I don’t think silence or ignoring the identities of students or their families is the way to promote an open honest space in which to grow and learn. NOR do I think that silence is the way to “protect” children from harassment or humiliation. This is how the world has been doing it, and it hasn’t worked yet. The truth is that we cannot protect children from their own inevitable sexuality. At this point in time, children are harassed and humiliated every day whether we ignore the GLBT issues or not. And yet, we have seen across the nation, that schools with GSA clubs and faculty/staff trainings tend to have more positive campus climate perceptions than schools without clubs or faculty/staff trainings. It is only with education, open minds, and visibility that we can begin to undermine the ignorance that causes people to harass and humiliate children based on some GLBT-related idea.
I am used to being asked questions that in most situations would be offensive (and sometimes are intended to be offensive), but these workshops are set up as safe spaces so that people CAN ask questions like this. It's better to get an answer instead of stewing in silence, hardened. Normally though, I get to respond in person with my own inflection and pacing. But I wonder, might this written response do a disservice to what attempts at helping this question-asker understand? Is possibly putting him on the defensive worth helping possibly numerous others?
I think one of the best parts of what you've written is the part about remembering that GLBT people are parts of families, and children are always being encouraged to talk about families. That you've focused on the world surrounding students rather than asking students to solidify their sexual identities seems like a nice way to speak to someone who is struggling to understand the place of such rhetoric with middle schoolers.
ReplyDeleteIf you want to protect this guy's tender heart, though, the only thing you might consider editing is the beginning of the response to part three-- it's what he deserves to hear, but perhaps not the phrasing most likely to encourage him to hear. It's hard to have any sentence starting with "So no," sound non-combative, and the all-caps NOR has a similar effect. I'm sure we all know the Tone Argument is ridiculous, but given that your goal is a sort of safe space, those were the only things that caught my eye. (Plus, I'm sure this guy has never in his life thought about the Tone Argument-- and therefore would find it a compelling piece of philosophy.)
Nick--I think these responses are thoughtful and honest. I do understand that tone and pacing can be upset slightly in a written format, but I think you manage to come across serious - not swayed - and educated. With that in mind, i would say that this opening, "First of all, I find the idea of letting the children fend for themselves, without guidance or support, is a very odd suggestion from an educator." Is a touch aggressive. I think it might be easier to say, "All people who interact with children, parents, educators, siblings and mentors, have found guidance and support of young people to be crucial in the early learning stages of all activities -- developing a sense of ones self and sexual or gender identity should be no different." Or something that keeps it forceful but not patronizing. I also think to round out the instructive tone you might drop a couple "It is your role as adults to assist children in their development." or "Our open minds and understanding effect young people in ways we do not entirely realize" -- just things that speak positively to the power of these educators and faculty members emphasizing their powerful and positive role in the lives of students, just to combat the "you might be failing these young people" accusation. Does that make sense? Let me know if you want to discuss these ideas further. Over all, this is great. I'm proud of the work you do.
ReplyDelete